What's the ROI on RTW?

It’s no surprise that claims-people like to use acronyms and abbreviations.  It’s as if we’ve got our own language…TTD, IME, PPD, IRE, RTW, ABC…just kidding with that last one, but it’s plausible.

The knee-jerk response of any business owner when asked to bring someone back to modified duty is typically, what’s this going to cost me?  It is important that employers understand what their potential return on investment is with a return to wellness (or, as others call it, return to work) program, but that is only part of the picture.  Examining the opportunity costs associated with modified duty will help an employer/business owner make the best decision, for their business and their employees.

What’s the return on RTW programs?
A 1993 study conducted by Crawford & Company estimated returns ranging from $8-10 for every $1 invested in a RTW program.  This same study noted an overall reduction in WC costs of 54%.

Roto Rooter Services Co. experienced a reduction in incurred WC losses from $1.4 million to $356,000 in one year, which was largely attributed to their RTW program¹. 

Gibson Greetings’ RTW program reportedly reduced their incurred WC losses from $400,000 to less than $50,000 the following year¹.

The RAND Institute (2010) published a working paper which examines the effectiveness of RTW programs.  The study suggests that for large employers, RTW programs are highly effective at reducing duration of absences due to work injuries, resulting in about a 3.6 week reduction in the median number of weeks away from work for an injured worker.²

Obviously, individual companies will experience varying results.  These statistics represent case studies that are likely not applicable to every industry nor every employer. 

What is the cost of doing nothing?
Without going into the nitty-gritty of calculating experience modification factors (if you’re a glutton for punishment, you can learn more on this by going visiting your state’s compensation rating bureau), the higher your experience mod is, the higher your premium calculation will be.  A credit score is used to assess a creditor’s risk when lending you money.  Similarly, an experience modification factor is used, among many other factors, to determine an insurer’s risk of insuring your company for workers’ compensation insurance.

The impact of a RTW program, or not having one, will depend on what type of policy you have.  If you’re an employer with a large deductible, you will see more “immediate” savings than someone on a guaranteed cost policy.  If you’re an employer who has a retrospective rating plan, then you have an incentive to lower your claims – a dividend! 

These are the direct costs associated with insurance premiums.  Consider your profit margin.  Think about how much more you would have to sell to offset a WC premium increase of $10,000.  Now, reconsider the cost of offering a few hours of modified work per day for 6 weeks.  There’s an opportunity for even greater savings in some states when a claim remains medical only as opposed to becoming a lost-time claim in regards to your experience modification factor.

We haven’t even discussed the indirect costs associated with having an injured worker out of work…lost productivity, decreased employee morale, increased potential of illegitimate claims, increased turnover, increased injury rates, increased costs of overtime, increased health insurance costs…  We’ll save that for another post.     

References:
1.   Friedman, S. (May 8, 1995).  Back-to-work WC programs pay big dividends.  National Underwriter, 99(19), 3;26.
2.   McLaren, C., Reville, & Seabury, S. A. (March, 2010). How effective are employer return to work programs? (Working Paper No. WC-745-CHSWC).  Retrieved from RAND http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2010/RAND_WR745.pdf.