You've hear of Undercover Boss, what about Undercover Injured Worker?

Most of us are probably familiar with the concept behind the show, "Undercover Boss."  The removed CEO or owner of a large corporation changes their identity and goes "undercover" working as a new hire that needs to learn the ropes of the less than glamorous positions in the company.  They're stripped of the everyday luxuries and live in a motel room, etc. to experience what their lowest paid employees make -- all in an attempt to understand what it's like to work for their company.  The show is usually very emotionally charged, and ends with the CEO having a revelation that changes need to be implemented, improvements need to be made, and sometimes they even shell out thousands of dollars to help an employee pay for overwhelming medical bills or something of the sort. 

I propose that employers go to work as an undercover injured worker.

Before you diminish the value of a safety measure, process improvement, or a return to work (RTW) program -- put on a pair of the proverbial "someone else's shoes" or work boots and see what the experience is like to have a workers' compensation claim.

I guarantee the experience will be eye-opening.  It will open your eyes first hand to a system that is riddled with challenges, confusion, complexity and bureaucracy -- a system that was designed to be a no-fault system to promptly provide benefits to any person injured on the job.  What does your accident investigation feel like?  How well does your injury reporting process work?  How does it treat injured workers?  How do our employees treat injured workers?  How does RTW impact the injured worker?

You'll learn how coworkers and supervisors treat you -- maybe with respect, maybe with pity, or maybe with anger or suspicion.  You'll learn what it's like to receive confusing forms in the mail, feel the uncertainty of whether or not you'll get a check in time to pay your bills, and realize that life does not stop simply because you got injured.  You may be limited in returning to work but your supervisor determines that there's "no light duty" in your company.  You'll feel the isolation and detachment within a few weeks of being out of work.  The attorney commercials will get old quickly; the resentment may build between you and your employer because you want to come back to work, but aren't being offered work.  You'll feel that people don't believe that you're really injured.  You might even see a weird car parked outside of your house that you soon discover is a surveillance company hired to see if you're doing anything outside of your restrictions. 

Now, in this scenario, you're not truly injured -- as an undercover injured worker, you're lucky that you don't have to go through the physical pain that results from an injury.  You won't have to worry about how you're going to button your own shirt, make yourself dinner, find a position to sleep comfortably because you can't use your arm due to a shoulder injury.  Fortunately, you won't have to feel how tiring and exhausting constant, throbbing pain can be and how it takes a toll on your ability to cope with stress.  Luckily, you also won't have to experience the strain that it puts on your relationship with your spouse and/or children now that you can't fulfill all of the requests you used to, cooking a meal, doing the laundry, driving the manual transmission car-- you won't have to experience what it's like to give up a good bit of independence nor will you realize how much that impacts your psychological state.

When someone has an injury, it doesn't stop at the physical level.  It impacts the injured worker from a financial, social, psychological and physical level.  It impacts their relationships, their confidence in their ability to provide for themselves or their family, and their place in this world.

Thankfully, I've never experienced a work injury.  How do I know to write about all of this stuff?  It's called empathy.  I took the time to imagine what it must be like to go through this process.  We all like to say that "if it were me in that position I'd do X, Y, and Z" but you never know until you've experienced it firsthand.

I encourage all employers who are in the position to make decisions related to the safety and well-being of their employees to take 10 minutes out of their day, at least once a month, to consider the "other side of the coin" when making a decision, not just the coins associated with implementing a change or offering modified duty.

Can we agree on one thing...? Variance between providers' RTW recommendations

In a 2010 study of healthcare providers’ agreement related to return to work (RTW) capabilities, researchers found some areas of consistency and some, well, not so consistent (Ikezawa, Battie, Beach & Gross, 2010).  The aim of the study was to determine if there are differences between providers as it relates to the information providers use to make RTW determinations, and what their RTW determinations were for three different case scenarios:  fracture, dislocation, and low back pain.  The survey focused on collecting three types of information.  Participants were asked to determine the following:  if the person was fit to return to work, assess the physical demands of their job, address any restrictions due to injury, determine the injured workers’ work capacity, and make any other recommendations if they were deemed unfit to work.  The second part of the survey focused on what type of information the participants used to make their decision, as well as commentary on what type of information would have improved their ability to make these determinations.  The final section of the survey focused on demographic information about the participants (specialty, gender, age, years of practice, etc.).

Inquiring minds want to know! 

The results indicate that 97% of the providers were in agreement with each other regarding the RTW readiness case of the fracture (p. 370).  This is likely due to fractures being of clear cut pathology.  Similarly, 94% of the providers agreed with each other related to RTW readiness for the dislocation scenario (p. 370).  For the low back pain case (a nurse who had back pain for eleven months), providers were basically split as to whether the injured worker should return to work or not – 55.6%.  Of note, however, with regards to the back pain case, 56% agreed that RTW with restrictions was appropriate; whereas 44% believed RTW full duty was appropriate. 

What did the providers rely upon to make these determinations?

Not surprisingly, experience and training will influence a provider’s recommendations.  In this study, researchers found the providers relying mostly upon physical examination, current functional status, and occupational status (pp. 370-371).  Providers stated that functional capacity exam (FCE) results, information on availability of modified duties, and patient participation in an occupational rehabilitation program would help improve their ability to accurately address RTW opportunities (p. 371).

Another interesting point made in this study is that only a small percentage of providers considered the sustainability of RTW, motivation to RTW, recovery expectations, and guarding movements.  Not until more recently are practitioners focusing on the biopsychosocial, or multi-dimensional, aspects of RTW.  These differences in approach will more than likely yield differing RTW recommendations and should be considered when evaluating a provider’s recommendations for RTW (p. 372).

 Regardless of their agreement, the majority of providers gave some type of RTW recommendation involving restrictions –so no matter their perspective (biomedical vs. biopsychosocial), we can expect some type of restrictions from an injury and prepare for them accordingly. 

 As noted above, the availability of modified duty was emphasized as being one of the factors providers are looking at when determining the injured worker’s release to RTW.  If you have modified duty, be sure that the providers are aware of it!  For those employers that utilized a panel of physicians or a providers list, send them copies of your modified duty jobs to keep on file in the event one of your employers visits there.  If that’s not the case, it would behoove you to provide the treating physician with a pre-injury job description and/or a modified duty job description to keep in the injured worker’s file.  The more informed provider will more than likely make a more accurate RTW recommendation.

References:

Ikezawa, Y., Battie, M. C., Beach, J., & Gross, D. (2010).  Do clinicians working within the same context make consistent return-to-work recommendations?.  Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20, 367-377. doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9230-z