Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Why do some claims go sour?

No matter how you’re connected to a workers’ compensation claim, you probably share the same goal as everyone else:  to get an injured worker prompt, appropriate medical care and return them to work.  You want to get on with business and life as usual. 

Anecdotally speaking, the overwhelming majority of claims follow a fairly smooth path.  An injury occurs, it gets reported, and the injured worker seeks medical treatment.  After a few weeks of treatment, the injured worker is released to return to work without restrictions.  Any required state forms are signed and returned.  After paying any outstanding medical bills that may drift in, the adjuster reviews the file and determines it is appropriate for closure.  

I’d venture to say that this scenario is not what typically comes to mind when discussing workers’ compensation claims.  Maybe it’s the attorney commercials, maybe it’s the horror stories from your neighbor or distant relative, or maybe it’s because something simply went wrong in the course of a claim that resulted in a negative impression of the system. 

What causes some claims to go sour while others resolve without issue?

Information asymmetry due to weak communication.
Communication, by definition, is an exchange of information between people. 
In a workers’ compensation claim, there are a lot of people, all with asymmetrical quantities of knowledge, experience, and information.  Workers’ compensation is a system that has been historically filled with distrust.  Not to mention, a workers’ compensation claim impacts people on a very personal level.  When you combine the number of people involved with the emotional impact a work injury can have, it’s almost like a keg of gun powder and it must be handled with care and respect. 

Throughout the claim process, there are numerous potential “breaking points.”   I’d be willing to bet most of them revolve around communication.  Appropriate communication can quell the symptoms of information asymmetry and has great potential to prevent claims from going sour.

Some of these breaking points are provided below, with a simplified version of a solution, focused on communication and empathy.

Problem:  The injured worker receives a collection agency notice because of an unpaid bill.  I put this one at the top of the list, as it is one of the simplest problems to prevent.

Solution:  Injured workers should not ignore a bill or invoice.  If an injured worker receives a bill it does NOT always mean the insurance carrier denied it.  It may be that they didn’t have the correct billing information, it got submitted to personal health insurance, or to the wrong insurance carrier.  A simple fix is to call the billing number on the invoice, and update them with the correct insurance information.  Waiting until a collection notice is received makes it more difficult for the workers’ compensation carrier to get an appropriate bill and medical records to make sure it is related to the accepted injury to review it for payment.

Problem:  The injured worker doesn’t receive their wage replacement check on time.
Solution:  Someone can contact the injured worker to let them know it will be late.

Problem:  The injured worker hasn’t heard from their employer for weeks.  They’re starting to wonder if they still have a job.

Monday, October 7, 2013

RTW: It takes a village

Recently, someone brought up an excellent point about human behavior and accountability.  It’s easy to point the finger at the person who’s not in the room.  Who’s ultimately responsible for returning an injured worker to modified duty?  The injured worker’s physician?  The employer?  The claim representative?  Based upon the contextual clue in the title of this post, you’ve more than likely determined that it isn’t just one person’s responsibility.    

Employers have a responsibility to provide a safe work environment for your employees, report claims, and stay in contact with injured workers.  Too many times the claim starts out and the injured worker is a “great employee” and then 6 months later when they are still recovering from their work injury, they’re now referred to as someone who is “milking the system.”  How does that happen?  Think about a relationship that has dwindled to the point of “acquaintance” as opposed to close friend.  If you haven’t talked to someone in a few months, it’s easy to draw conclusions about the reason for the lack of communication.  I’d be willing to bet you aren’t looking introspectively or taking accountability for losing contact.  It’s only human to attribute a negative outcome to the actions or someone else. 

Injured workers have a responsibility to report injuries to their employers participate in their recovery, follow the advice and restrictions of their physicians, and to keep their employer and claim representative apprised of any changes in their work and treatment status.  Injured workers should participate in the RTW process.  How?  Injured workers can make suggestions about what parts of their job they think they can do. 

Claim Representatives can make or break the outcome of the majority of claims.  Yes, it is true that at the end of the day people will do what they feel they need to do, but we need to take a few steps back and think about what led up to the current situation.  Did the injured worker have unanswered questions?  Did they receive another collection notice for an unpaid bill (because the biller simply didn’t have the WC claim information)?  Did they hear rumors that their job was in jeopardy?  While we can’t prevent every outcome, we can lay the foundation for open communication, education, and understanding.  We should never lose sight of the fact that we’re providing a benefit to an injured worker on behalf of their employer.  The goal is to provide appropriate medical treatment to rehabilitate the injured worker to their pre-injury state, or as close as possible.

It truly does take a village.  We didn’t even mention the roles of the medical providers, case managers, or attorneys...  

I’m not saying that at the end of the day we’re all going to be “friends” on Facebook, or that we’ll go to happy hour together after work.  My point is, the sooner we all realize that we have a responsibility and an interest in getting an injured worker back to work, the sooner we will see RTW challenges resolve.

Monday, September 16, 2013

Modified duty job offer letters communicate more than just RTW details

Return to work date, restrictions, hours, wages…
These are important elements of a modified duty job offer letter.  A modified duty job offer represents much more than a letter – it sends long lasting messages about an employer’s relationship with their employees, particularly in a time of stress or uncertainty.

If I get hurt, my employer will work with me to bring me back to work.
When employers offer modified duty, it demonstrates that they are willing to make some accommodations for someone who wants to work.  Involving the injured worker in the return to work (RTW) conversation is an important step – after all, they are the ones who are doing the work.  Listen to the injured worker’s complaints.  Consider altering their assignments or scaling back their hours if indicated.  Not every RTW will be a success the first time around.  Instead of throwing in the towel, talk to the claim representative, nurse case manager, and ask them to address this with the treating physician. 

My employer offers modified duty, so getting injured at work does not equate to sitting at home.
This is an incredibly important message.  Employees learn from what they see happen with other injured workers.  While the overwhelming majority of claims are legitimate, there are a sometimes people who wish to file an illegitimate claim or “build” their legitimate claim.  Having a strong RTW program that consistently gets injured workers back to work can help eliminate the motivation for filing illegitimate claims or exaggeration of existing claims.  Modified duty job offers shorten the time and injured worker will be out of work.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

A RTW Case Study: How a $500 wage loss claim cost this employer thousands

Five hundred dollars if $500, right?  Not for this Indiana employer. 

Using actual claim figures and premium calculations, this post will demonstrate how $500 in indemnity (wage) payments resulted in a premium increase of more than $4,000.

Each year, an employer’s experience modification factor is calculated based on prior years’ losses. 
In some states, such as Indiana in this example, medical-only claims are reduced by 70%.  Medical-only claims are claims in which only medical costs were paid, and no indemnity (wage) payments were made under the claim.  So, for explanatory purposes, if an employer has a $1,000 medical-only claim, it is reduced (for the sake of calculating their experience modification factor) by 70%, to $300.  The claim still cost $1,000, but only $300 of that will be considered in their “mod” calculation.

So, how does $509 end up costing the employer $4,000?

If the employer would have brought the injured worker back to modified duty without incurring any wage payments under their policy, it would have reduced the costs of their indemnity claims dollars paid to $0.  They would have also counted as medical-only claims.  However, because these claims in their loss history were not kept as medical-only, the employer loses the benefit of the 70% reduction in claims.

Think of keeping claims as medical-only like a discount coupon at the grocery store.  You must return all injured workers to modified duty to get 70% off your [medical] claim costs.

So, how does $509 end up costing the employer $4,000?

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

What happens after RTW?

If you’ve been following this blog, you’ll realize many of our posts focus on the process of identifying modified duty, the benefits of RTW, and developing RTW programs.  Getting someone back to work is important, but it doesn’t stop at the RTW date.  It’s a phase of the return to wellness process that must be managed.

What happens after an injured worker returns to work?
I’m sure one could find bits and pieces of answers to this question in books, and there are plenty of scholarly journal articles on this topic, trust me.  Personal experience will teach employers the most in this regard.  Not the answer you were looking for?  What follows is an attempt to summarize the most frequently learned lessons.

Communicate the return to work date to your claim representative immediately!
There simply aren’t enough font embellishments with which one can emphasize this point!  Prompt communication of the injured worker’s return to work will prevent plenty a problem:  over payments, taking credits against future benefits, getting the appropriate forms filed with the state’s workers’ compensation authority…  It’s also a great feeling for the claim representative to know that we’re returning someone to modified duty.  So it not for any other reason, notify your claim representative to provide them with the good news.

Medical treatment
Just because an injured worker returns to modified duty, doesn’t mean that they are no longer entitled to medical benefits.  This is a concern of injured workers when they contemplate RTW.  Returning to modified duty is part of an injured worker’s recovery.  As one person put it, you don’t get better and go back to work, you go back to work to get better.  It is common for an injured worker to continue physical therapy or use of prescription medications after RTW.

Employers should encourage injured workers to schedule their physical therapy and doctor’s appointments outside of the work day.  Check with your claim representative, as it depends on the state and the type of appointment (IME, etc.).  It may also be a good idea to locate a physical therapy location that is on the injured worker’s way home.

Wages
What happens if the injured worker receives less in wages than they previously earned?  As with all answers to WC claim questions…it depends.  In most states, there are temporary partial disability benefits.  These are paid as a percentage of the difference, or gap, in post-injury wages compared to pre-injury wages (calculated as the average weekly wage – AWW).  These percentages range from 50% to 90%. 

Employers process their payroll as usual and if the injured worker’s weekly earnings are less than the pre-injury average weekly wage, they should submit the payroll records to their claim representative who will review and process any TPD benefits due to the injured worker.  So, the injured worker will receive a paycheck for hours worked, and a TPD check for a percentage of the gap. 

What if the injured worker is disruptive or violates company policies?